latest
How Jasiel Correia could “win” the recall election
We are just a few days (maybe weeks) away from a recall election date being set for the recall election involving Fall River Mayor Jasiel Correia. If you haven’t yet, read my article ‘Yes, a recalled mayor could win the Fall River recall election’ – it provides an interesting take on the upcoming recall election. Need to catch up on the recall election? Go here.
A recall election will have two parts – “Should Mayor Jasiel Correia be recalled?” and “Who should be elected mayor?” I do believe Jasiel will get recalled but could win the recall. Here’s how it happens.
One on one, Jasiel Correia likely loses to just about anyone who runs against him in the recall election. But what happens if a half dozen quality candidates run against him? They split the vote and Jasiel wins. That’s the flaw of a recall election compared to a standard election where you have a primary and a general election.
Unofficial names floating around right now are Paul Coogan, Sam Sutter, Kyle Riley, and Will Flanagan. I could also see the most vocal people on the current Fall River City Council throwing their hats in the ring; Shawn Cadime and Cliff Ponte. Cadime ran in the 2014 recall election and Cliff Ponte ends his term as City Council President in January. Former city councilor Linda Pereira who lost to Mayor Correia in 2017 could also make a comeback.
If at least three of the seven people mentioned decide to run in the recall election, I could see Mayor Correia winning the recall. In the 2014 recall election, recalled Mayor Will Flanagan finished second against 7 challengers, but the 2019 race could be very different. Sam Sutter won 6,021 votes to Flanagan’s 4,393 – easy victory, right? Not so fast.
In 2014, it was essentially Flanagan against Sutter and Cadime (and to a lesser extent Michael Miozza). The problem for Flanagan was that Shawn Cadime was Flanagan’s former city administrator for 4 years. In 2014, Cadime and Flanagan split the vote. If a senior member of Jasiel’s administration ran in the recall election, they would split the vote as well. You can’t work for someone for 10 years and then suddenly say, “vote for me, I’m different.”
The 2014 and 2019 recall elections could be very different with a clear path to victory for Jasiel. The 2019 recall election field of candidates could be a long list of very qualified candidates splitting the anti-Jasiel vote. In a normal election for mayor, you have a primary then the top two vote-getters move on to a general election a month later where the second vote-getter has a real chance of victory. This is especially true if the candidates knocked out of the primary back the #2 in the general election. What if Flanagan and Sutter moved on to a final election and Cadime backed Flanagan in 2014? In 2014 Sutter won with 37% of the vote and then went on to lose to Correia 8,268 to 7,621. As you can see, winning a recall election with 8 total candidates doesn’t translate into victory in a general election with just two candidates.
If Jasiel is running against three or four solid candidates, expect Jasiel to easily lose the recall, but then get elected mayor. You may have to read that twice. Then it’s off to the regular 2019 election roughly six months later, which may not even include Jasiel Correia on the ballot if he is convicted of any of his 13 federal indictments. Aren’t Fall River politics great?
-
Community7 years ago
National Shrine of La Salette Festival of Lights 2017 set to begin
-
Community6 years ago
Massachusetts State Police looking for good home for retired dogs
-
Crime6 years ago
Fall River ranked most dangerous city in Massachusetts according to report
-
latest7 years ago
Durfee student allegedly overdoses on marijuana
-
Community6 years ago
Video of Fall River Police goes viral
-
Causes6 years ago
Missing Fall River woman found deceased
-
Crime7 years ago
Fall River Police add names to most wanted list
-
Causes6 years ago
Fall River teenager reported missing has been found
MP Feitelberg
January 11, 2019 at 1:01 am
If only one of the Correia indictments came through before the recall election, then we could be done with him and move on. Shame on the creep for staying after all he’s already put this city through! It’s pure selfishness — or selfishness plus greed, plus destruction of evidence.